Posted by
nvgdefd on Friday, August 07, 2009 4:08:38 AM
It was confessed that the Buy isk equipment of the “Summons the Beast” of the Netease was purchased it on Taobao, the Netease side was to force the confiscation of the goods are stolen. Mr. Zhang, he is a player from Zhenjiang, and he has multi-representations at several times, but it has no results. Therefore, he has prosecution the Netease Company to the Court of Zhenjiang Jingkou yesterday. In addition to asking the Netease Company to resume the “Summons the Beast” which it has been confiscated, and Mr. Zhang also requests the Netease to compensation for the 12sky2 gold mental anguish fee of 2,000 Yuan. It is reported that this is the first case of the court to accept the player to prosecution the Game Company to compensation the virtual property.
The plaintiff, Mr. Zhang, he said that he is an online game players of the defendant carrier of the "Fantasy Westward Journey". At 3:11 am on July 23, 2009, Mr. Zhang spent 350 yuan to bought the “Summons the Beast” of the "Fantasy Westward Journey" on Taobao of the Alibaba. In the atlantica gold transaction process of the “Summons the Beast”, Mr. Zhang was carries on strictly accordance with the procedures of the transaction. At first, he sneak 350 Yuan into the “the payment treasure” by his own online payment, then the seller would tell the account of the “Summons the Beast” to Mr. Zhang in the game, Mr. Zhang has obtained the archlord gold ownership of the “Summons the Beast” through the purchase. At 23:47pm on July 24, suddenly, the account was forced offline in the game when Mr. Zhang was great to playing the "Fantasy Westward Journey". After 5 minutes, the Netease was sent a system e-mail to him when he was logging it again. The content is that, “Your “Summons the Beast” have been identify that was the loss of virtual property form other stolen players, at present, it has been recovered by the system and returned to the owner. If you have any rappelz rupees questions, please check the code of relevant content to the players.” In this way, the “Summons the Beast” has been confiscated.
Mr. Zhang was made the phone to negotiate with the Netease Company several times after the event had happened. He was request the Netease Company to restore the equipment which it has been confiscated. And the Netease Company said that the game equipment must be trading in the game system, therefore, Mr. Zhang has been refused for the request. Mr. Zhang believes that the defendant Guangzhou Netease Interactive Entertainment Ltd as a network operator charges, it is not have the entitled to confiscate or dispose the personal property of the citizens, and it can not be based on a system e-mail to confiscation the legitimate personal income, their actions have violation of his ownership of property. According to the above, Mr. Zhang has prosecution to the court; he was request the Netease Company to restore the equipment which it has been confiscated and compensation for the mental anguish fee of 2,000 Yuan.
The reporter was learned that the court will send the complaint to the Guangzhou Netease Interactive Entertainment Limited in the statutory limit time after admissibility this particular tort case, and it will optional a day to trial in hearing this case.